Reviewers Have a Responsibility to Promote Ethical Peer Review by:

All articles undergo an initial assessment by the journal editor. EDITORIAL POLICIES AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS.

5 Great Tips On How To Deal With Peer Review Problems Enago Academy

It is the responsibility of the author to ensure that all authors that contributed to the work are fairly acknowledged and that the published author list accurately reflects individual contributions.

. EDITORIAL POLICIES AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS. The Editorial Board reserves the final right to decide the manuscript. OUP expects all published articles to contain clear and accurate attribution of authorship.

The Editorial Board decides whether a contribution will be sent for peer review and if so will consider the peer reviewers reports and make the final decision to accept or reject the manuscript for publication. Except where otherwise stated manuscripts are single-blind peer reviewed where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors but the reviewer. The acceptance criteria for all papers are the quality and originality of the research and its significance to journal readership.

If they are considered suitable for consideration articles will then be a reviewed by a minimum of two external reviewers to assess suitability for publication. The journal operates a double-anonymous peer review model. Final responsibility for editorial decisions rests with the Editor-in.

Fair editing and peer review. Peer Review and Acceptance. Peer Review and Acceptance.

Ethics For Peer Reviewers Plos

Ethics For Peer Reviewers Plos

General And Ethical Guidelines For Reviewers Wiley